3

On a Mac, how can I sort about 2400 jpg according to their creation date (i. e. stat -f %SB) via terminal and convert them in that order into one pdf?

What if one jpg has been created today at 11:10 pm and a second one shortly after within the same minute at 11:10 pm? Are there seconds in the creation date, which can be taken into account?

Prvt_Yadav
  • 5,732
  • 7
  • 32
  • 48
Til Hund
  • 147
  • 2
  • 9
  • You can do this easily with `zsh` (e.g. [custom sorting](https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/332396)). I don't have access to OSX so cannot post an answer but this should be piece of cake... – don_crissti Aug 05 '17 at 09:43

3 Answers3

3

It depends on the filesystem. For example, on my host, I am using the fourth extended filesystem (ext4), and stat reports thusly for files:

$ touch foo; stat foo; rm foo
  File: 'foo'
  Size: 0           Blocks: 0          IO Block: 4096   regular empty file
Device: fc00h/64512d    Inode: 262155      Links: 1
Access: (0664/-rw-rw-r--)  Uid: ( 1000/   ownerusername)   Gid: ( 1000/   ownerusername)
Access: 2017-06-21 14:28:16.150323827 -0700
Modify: 2017-06-21 14:28:16.150323827 -0700
Change: 2017-06-21 14:28:16.150323827 -0700
 Birth: -

So you can use the last-modified time as create time is something of a misnomer.

find /path/to/images -type f -print0 -name \*.jpg | xargs -0 stat -c "%y|%n" | sort | awk -F'|' '{print $2}'

This somewhat cumbersome construct will give you a list of files in order by last modification time (provided you have no files with | in their names).

Once you have and have reviewed this list, you can use Imagemagick's convert tool to assemble the PDF:

convert <<list of files>> outputfile.pdf

Or, to do it all at once:

convert $(find /path/to/images -type f -print0 -name \*.jpg | xargs -0 stat -c "%y|%n" | sort | awk -F'|' '{print $2}') outputfile.pdf
Pang
  • 241
  • 2
  • 7
DopeGhoti
  • 73,792
  • 8
  • 97
  • 133
  • The OP mentions nothing about parsing exif data, however. – DopeGhoti Jun 21 '17 at 21:51
  • DopeGhoti, thank you very much your reply. When I try the above command I get the following error message `stat: illegal option -- c`. It is true, the picture I have do not have EXIF data. – Til Hund Jun 22 '17 at 20:17
  • Do you know which filesystem is in question here? `stat -c` works for me in my tests. – DopeGhoti Jun 22 '17 at 20:31
  • I might add that I want to use the above command on a Mac. I did not mentioned it before as I thought it would be irrelevant to the question. The filesystem would be `HFS Plus` or `Mac OS Extended (Journaled)`. – Til Hund Jun 23 '17 at 08:04
  • For a Mac, use `stat -f "%a|%N"`. – DopeGhoti Jun 28 '17 at 16:05
  • For me on my Mac only `stat -f %SB` did the work. However, adding this to the above script would not result in the desired pdf. – Til Hund Jul 31 '17 at 12:55
1

A simple command line with ImageMagick convert works for me.

I tested with the following command line (in a directory with 14 png files), and there will be one picture per page in the pdf file.

convert  *.png out-parrot.pdf

But there can be problems with some versions of convert

It works as intended with the version of convert in Parrot 4.4

$convert --version
Version: ImageMagick 6.9.10-23 Q16 x86_64 20190101 https://imagemagick.org

but it does not work with the version of convert in Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS (up to date in February 2019)

$ convert --version
Version: ImageMagick 6.9.7-4 Q16 x86_64 20170114 http://www.imagemagick.org

This version is 'not authorized' to write pdf files

$ convert  *.png out-ubuntu.pdf
convert-im6.q16: not authorized `out-ubuntu.pdf' @ error/constitute.c/WriteImage/1037.

$ apt-cache policy imagemagick
imagemagick:
  Installed: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6.4
  Candidate: 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6.4
  Version table:
 *** 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6.4 500
        500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6 500
        500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages

Via an Ubuntu mailing list I had the following answer (that converting to pdf was turned off because of problems with ImageMagick vulnerabilities)

Is this a bug in ImageMagick convert, specifically for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, or is converting to pdf turned off by intention?

The change was intentional. See https://usn.ubuntu.com/3785-1/

Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

sudodus
  • 6,071
  • 14
  • 27
0

Install ImageMagick. Assuming the JPG images are in ~/images and the file names don't contain any spaces (nor any of \[*?) and you have a directory ~/combined:

convert -combine -append $(ls -tr ~/images/*.jpg) ~/combined/all.jpg

or

  convert -combine -append $(ls -tr ~/images/*.jpg) ~/combined/all.pdf

If the images are not the same size, you will get warnings. -append combines images top to bottom. Change to +append and images will combine left to right.

Time: Although ls -l shows time down to hour:minute, Linux keeps track of the access, modify, and age/change times down to the nano second I believe. So sorting by ls -tr does account for even fractions of seconds.

Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'
  • 807,993
  • 194
  • 1,674
  • 2,175
Deathgrip
  • 2,496
  • 1
  • 9
  • 16
  • 1
    [Don't parse `ls`](http://mywiki.wooledge.org/ParsingLs). – DopeGhoti Jun 21 '17 at 21:43
  • Thank you, Deathgrip, for answering. How can I convert the pictures into a single pdf as asked above? – Til Hund Jun 21 '17 at 21:43
  • @DopeGhoti - huh? the command works fine and I tested it using CentOS 7. – Deathgrip Jun 21 '17 at 21:46
  • It will fail if any of those file names contains `[[:space:]]`... – don_crissti Jun 21 '17 at 21:47
  • Trying to parse the output of an `ls` is an exercise which, while it may seem to work, is a terribly bad habit to get into for many _many_ security-related reasons, which the link included in my answer goes into in great detail. More detail can be found [here](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/128985/why-not-parse-ls). – DopeGhoti Jun 21 '17 at 21:47
  • https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/128985/why-not-parse-ls – Deathgrip Jun 21 '17 at 22:08